Clarkson is a pillock!

What a pillock! Clarkson does it again on TV's one show he said about the strikers

'Frankly, I'd have them all shot. I would take them outside and execute them in front of their families. I mean, how dare they go on strike when they have these gilt-edged pensions that are going to be guaranteed while the rest of us have to work for a living?

Lets put this into a little perspective

aside from the obvious disgrace with regard to having anyone shot ( this does happen to real people in real life Mr Clarkson).

This mans work - is mainly being nasty or stupid in print or on TV. Nice work if you can can it. Not everybody can get such an easy gig. He is a priviliged underachieving twat and should not forget it. If he dissapeared the world would be a slightly cleaner brighter place as there would be less nastiness about- if some of the people he is talking about dissapeared - people would die, things that need to happen would not happen and Clarkson would find himself without some of the thiings that make his life so sweet.

 Clarkson contributes nothing of use to the world - he is an extra, a spare part but some of the people he is talking about have dedicated their life to public service only to find Cameron, the British Prime Minister stealing the food from their mouths to fund his political aspirations

And here we get to it the nub. he is a chum of David Cameron and will benefit from the loss of public services (while complaining that the remainder cannot do the work of two no doubt). .

It is not the only area on which Clarkson has ventrured and oopinion. He thinks we pay too much fuel duty - why? beciause he uses a like to drive cars. He does not like the speed limit, why? becuase he wants to drive at them at high speed, he does not like caravans why? they take up space on his road getting in his way ...get the picture.

The people Clarkson rails against do not have a gilt edged pension as he suggests and include the poorest in the country and what they do have is being stolen from them so people like Clarkson can pay less tax. What he calls work is actually a privileged lifestyle and an unecessary job. I doubt that he could do a whole days proper work either in manual terms or in taking the responsibility for making tough decisions - that in doing x we cannot do y and living with the consequence of that decision proffessionally.

This man should not have access to public money and should get no more work from the BBC. We should stop watching him and reading him so he has to retire on his wealth. Perhaps the organisation that holds his money can collapse and his penision and savings dissapear so he has to return to the world of work, for that is the biggest insult.

This man thinks he works for a living.
CM